Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3730/2026 of KRISHNA HAZARIKA ALIAS KRISHNA DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 19 July 2026
GAHC010145392026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3730/2026 KRISHNA HAZARIKA ALIAS KRISHNA DAS S/O LATE RAJI HAZARIKA,R/O VILLAGE NO. 3 AMTOLA, P.O. KUKURMARA, P.S. CHHAYGAON, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781134.
GAHC010145392026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3730/2026
KRISHNA HAZARIKA ALIAS KRISHNA DAS
S/O LATE RAJI HAZARIKA,R/O VILLAGE NO. 3 AMTOLA, P.O.
KUKURMARA, P.S. CHHAYGAON, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-
781134.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF LAND ACQUISITION, DISPUR, ASSAM, PIN -781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP AT AMINGAON
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781031.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
CHHAYGAON REVENUE CIRCLE
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781134
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S DAS, MRS. A DAS,E KHANDAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.07.2026
Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to in advertence, some of the necessary parties could not be impleaded as party-respondents in the instant writ petition. Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1 is present. Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 has submitted that the petitioner’s claim is for Zirat compensation is relatable to the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 and in this writ petition, none of the respondents is an authority under the National Highways Act, 1956. Therefore, this writ petition entails dismissal at the threshold due to non-impleadment of the necessary party- respondents. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh with proper details and with impleadment of the necessary parties.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant