Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5499/2025 of SALIM UDDIN LASKAR AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 19 July 2026
GAHC010209292025 2026:GAU-AS:9938 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5499/2025 SALIM UDDIN LASKAR AND ORS S/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI . R/O - VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I, DIST- CACHAR, P.O- MEHERPUR SO, P.S-
GAHC010209292025
2026:GAU-AS:9938
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5499/2025
SALIM UDDIN LASKAR AND ORS
S/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI .
R/O - VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I, DIST- CACHAR, P.O- MEHERPUR SO, P.S- SILCHAR, PIN- 788015
2: GULBAHAR BEGUM BARBHUIYA
D/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I
DIST- CACHAR
PO- MEHERPUR SO
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788015
3: MONJU BEGUM MAZUMDER
D/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I
DIST- CACHAR
PO- MEHERPUR SO
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788015
4: KARIM UDDIN LASKAR
S/O- LATE ACHAR ALI AND LATE KUTIBANU BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I
DIST- CACHAR
PO- MEHERPUR SO
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788015
5: SAMSUL ALAM LASKAR
S/O- LATE ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR.
R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I
DIST- CACHAR
P.O- MEHERPUR SO
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788015.
6: RAFIUL ALAM LASKAR
S/O- LATE ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR..
R/O- VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-I
DIST- CACHAR
PO- MEHERPUR SO
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788015
7: FAIJUR RAHAMAN BARBHUIYA
S/O- LATE IBRAHIM ALI BARBHUIYA AND LATE LECHU BIBI BARBHUIYA.
S/O- ABDUL RAHMAN LASKAR.
R/O - VILLAGE- BREN NAGAR
DIST-CACHAR
P.O- LANGLACHARA PT-I
P.S.-JOYPUR
PIN-788108
8: JALAL UDDIN KHAN
S/O- LATE NENA MIYA KHAN AND LATE SAILY BIBI KHAN.
R/O VILLAGE- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PT-IV
DIST- CACHAR
P.O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR B.O
P.S- SILCHAR
PIN-788006
9: MANIK UDDIN BARBHUIYA
S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II
DIST-CACHAR
PO- SAIDPUR B.O
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 788013
10: TAFAJUL ALI BARBHUIYA
S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II
DIST.-CACHAR
P.O- SAIDPUR B.O
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN-788013
11: KAMAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA
S/O- LATE ANFOR ALI AND LATE NURJAHAN BIBI.
R/O- VILLAGE- BARIKNAGAR PT-II
DIST.-CACHAR
P.O- SAIDPUR B.O
P.S-SILCHAR
PIN- 78801
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE
TO THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CACHAR DACK BANGLOW ROAD
NEAR COURT COMPOUND
TARAPUR
SILCHAR
CACHAR
ASSAM- 788001.
3:SETTLEMENT OFFICER
CACHAR AND HAILAKANDI DISTRICTS
TARAPUR
SILCHAR
CACHAR DISTRICT
ASSAM PIN- 788001
4:ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER
SILCHAR SADAR CIRCLE
SILCHAR CACHAR
DISTRICT ASSAM
PIN-78800
For the Petitioner(s) : Dr. G. J. Sarmah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Borpujari, SC, Revenue Mr. N. Das, Govt. Advocate BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
20.07.2026
Heard Dr. G. J. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners. Mr. R. Borppujari, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue Department and Mr. N. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the State Respondents.
2. 11 Petitioners claim rights over a plot of land covered by Dag Nos.565, 566, 567 and 568 pertaining to the 2nd R.S. Patta No.191 which have now been brought under Town Block No.1, Plot No.176 on the basis of inheritance being the legal heirs of one Sitara Banu Bibi who was the original owner of the said plot of land.
3. The grievance of the Petitioners is that although the Petitioners sought for mutating their names in the revenue records by filing applications before the Respondent No.4, however, the said process has not been proceeded with by the Respondent No.4 and on account of the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondent No.4, the Petitioners being aggrieved have approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
4. This Court duly takes note of that the applications were filed in the year 2025, and as such, as per the provisions of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 ought to have decided the application taking into account that at present, the 3rd Revenue Settlement proceedings are going on.
5. Considering the above, this Court therefore disposes of the instant writ petition.
6. This Court had not decided the inter-se rights of the Petitioners to have their names included in the mutation records, which aspect the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 shall duly decide thereby directing the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take effective steps for an early conclusion of the said mutation proceedings and preferably within a period of 4 months from the date a certified copy of the present order is served upon the Respondent No.3.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant