Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2334/2026 of SRI GOPI DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 19 July 2026
GAHC010146752026 2026:GAU-AS:9929 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2334/2026 SRI GOPI DAS SON OF LATE JITENDRA DAS ALIAS JITENDRA RAJBONGSHI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAT BOINIR TUP P.O. BARPETA ROAD, DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM
GAHC010146752026
2026:GAU-AS:9929
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2334/2026
SRI GOPI DAS
SON OF LATE JITENDRA DAS ALIAS JITENDRA RAJBONGSHI RESIDENT
OF VILLAGE SAT BOINIR TUP P.O. BARPETA ROAD, DISTRICT - BARPETA
ASSAM PIN-781313
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA DISTRICT
BARPETA
PIN 781301
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BARNAGAR REVENUE CIRCLE
SORBHOG PIN -781317
5:STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPA ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY
C/O OFFICE OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ASSAM
BAMUNIMAIDAN
GUWAHATI
PIN 781021
6:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
NORTH KAMRUP DIVISION
RANGIA
PIN - 78135
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. A. Bhattacharya, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Das, Govt. Advocate Ms. G. Hazarika, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.07.2026
Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharya, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Mr. N. Das, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 and Ms. G. Hazarika, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 2.
2. This is an application filed by the petitioner No. 1 in the accompanying writ petition as the applicant seeking leave of this Court to withdraw from the accompanying writ proceedings.
3. The respondents, who have entered appearance, have no objection to the same.
4. Consequently, the petitioner No. 1 in the accompanying writ petition, who is the applicant herein, is granted the leave to withdraw at the risk of the petitioner No. 1/applicant.
5. With the above observations, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant