Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3106/2020 of PRABIR BISWAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 16 July 2026
GAHC010127142025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3106/2020 PRABIR BISWAS S/O LT. GOPES BISWAS R/O VILL. PANIKHAITI P.O. AND P.S. PRAGJYOSITPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE
GAHC010127142025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3106/2020
PRABIR BISWAS
S/O LT. GOPES BISWAS
R/O VILL. PANIKHAITI
P.O. AND P.S. PRAGJYOSITPUR
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPTT. DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
ASSAM
2:UNION OF INDIA
REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER
NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
CHANDRAPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
------------
For the Petitioner(s) : None appears.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Chakraborty, CGC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.07.2026
Ms. P. Bhattacharyya, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the Petitioner in WP(C) No.3294/2025 fairly submitted that the said Petitioner is the wife of the Petitioner in WP(C) No.3106/2020.
2. It is further submitted that the Petitioner in WP(C) No.3106/2020 expired and thereupon a subsequent notice was issued which is the subject matter of challenge in WP(C) No.3294/2025.
3. Taking into account that in respect to the same property, the notice was issued upon the Petitioner in WP(C) No.3106/2020 and the said Petitioner had expired and as there has been no substitution, the said proceedings cannot be further proceeded with.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed without prejudice to the rights of the Petitioner in WP(C) No.3294/2025.
5. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant