Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3679/2026 of PATANJALI FOODS LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010136732026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3679/2026 PATANJALI FOODS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LIMITED), A COMPANY DULY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT AND

GAHC010136732026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3679/2026

PATANJALI FOODS LIMITED

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LIMITED), A

COMPANY DULY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE

COMPANIES ACT AND REGISTERED UNDER THE ASSAM VALUE ADDED

TAX ACT, 2003 VIDE TIN NO. 18680034206, HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE

OF BUSINESS IN ASSAM AT C/O K K WAREHOUSING PVT LTD., SARUSAJAI

GUWAHATI, ASSAM, REPRESENTED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS BY ITS

AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR MADHAVKUMAR VADODARIYA, MANAGER (TAX LITIGATION) OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND TXATION, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -781006.

2:THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES

KAR BHAWAN

BISHNU PRASAD RAVA FLYOVER

DISPUR

GUWAHATI

ASSAM- 781006.

3:THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES ASSAM REVISIONAL AUTHORITY

KAR BHAWAN

BISHNU PRASAD RAVA FLYOVER

DISPUR

GUWAHATI

ASSAM- 781006.

4:REQUISITIONING OFFICER

CIRCLE 99 GUWAHATI-C

GUWAHATI KAMRUP (U) ASSAM-7810 06.

5:SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES (RECOVERY) AND BAKIJAI OFFICER

KAR BHAWAN

BISHNU PRASAD RAVA FLYOVER

DISPUR

GUWAHATI

ASSAM

6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXES

CENTRAL VAT AUDIT TEAM

ASSAM

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES

ASSAM

KAR BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI

ASSAM-7810 06

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MITRA, MR S.MITRA,MR A K BORO,A R ANSARI

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 17-07-2026 Mr. S. Mitra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that certain inadvertent errors have crept in the writ petition and, therefore, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh. Mr. H. Baruah, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation Department, who is present, has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Mitra, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead