Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3669/2026 of SRI TANU KONWAR ALIAS TANURAM KONWAR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS on 16 July 2026
GAHC010141672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3669/2026 SRI TANU KONWAR ALIAS TANURAM KONWAR SON OF LATE SABHARAM KONWAR, RESIDENT OF STATION ROAD, WARD NO-13, P.O AND P.S.-SIBASAGAR, DIST-SIBASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS
GAHC010141672026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3669/2026
SRI TANU KONWAR ALIAS TANURAM KONWAR
SON OF LATE SABHARAM KONWAR, RESIDENT OF STATION ROAD, WARD
NO-13, P.O AND P.S.-SIBASAGAR, DIST-SIBASAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS TO THE
GOVT. OF INDIA, RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI.
2:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER
MALIGAON
NF RAILWAY
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
3:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER
TINSUKIA DIVISION
NF RAILWAY
TINSUKIA
ASSAM
4:THE ESTATE OFFICER
NF RAILWAY
TINSUKIA DIVISION
TINSUKIA
ASSAM
5:THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER (W)
MARIANI
NF RAILWAY
MARIANI
JORHAT
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, B SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.07.2026
Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. K Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for all the respondents is present and has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made by Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant