Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3664/2026 of TAJ UDDIN MAZUMDER Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
GAHC010139712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3664/2026 TAJ UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O TURFAN ALI MAZUMDER, VILLAGE-RONGPUR PART-I, P.O. DAYAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010139712026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3664/2026
TAJ UDDIN MAZUMDER
S/O TURFAN ALI MAZUMDER,
VILLAGE-RONGPUR PART-I,
P.O. DAYAPUR,
P.S. SILCHAR,
DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI 110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAMREVENUE DISASTER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENTDISPURGUWAHATI 781006.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF LAND
ACQUISITION
CACHARSILCHAR.
4:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF LAND
ACQUISITION
CACHARSILCHAR.
5:THE ARBITRATOR
REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAMREVENUE DISASTER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENTDISPURGUWAHATI 781006.
Page No.# 2/2
6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD LAKHIPUR BARKHOLA AND KATIGORAH TERRITORIAL BUILDING
DIVISIONCACHARSILCHAR.
7:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LTD NHIDCL
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY GENERAL
MANAGERNHIDCLCACHARSILCHA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SAYED SALIM AHMED, MS S DAS,MR H R A
CHOUDHURY,MR F U BARBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC. REVENUE,SC, PWD,SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17-07-2026 Mr. S.S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instructions, that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department; Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam and Mrs. R. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant