Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/733/2026 of ASIR UDDIN AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 16 July 2026
GAHC010036262026 2026:GAU-AS:9855-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/733/2026 ASIR UDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE GOTU SHEIKH, R/O- VILL.- ABHAYAPURI ROUMARI, P.O. ABHAYAPURI, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, PIN- 783384. 2: DEWAN MD. SHAMSUL
GAHC010036262026
2026:GAU-AS:9855-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/733/2026
ASIR UDDIN AHMED
S/O- LATE GOTU SHEIKH, R/O- VILL.- ABHAYAPURI ROUMARI, P.O.
ABHAYAPURI, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, PIN- 783384.
2: DEWAN MD. SHAMSUL ALOM
S/O- LATE ABDUL AWAL DEWAN
R/O- VILL.- BALAIPATHAR
P.O. KALGACHIA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781319.
3: ANOWAR HUSSAIN
S/O- LATE MOHI UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL. AND P.O. ISABPUR
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781321.
4: CHAND MAMUD
S/O- GOHER UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- DUMERGURI
P.O. LENGISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
5: GOLAM RABBANI
C/O- LATE HAZI KACHAR UDDIN
R/O- VILL.- JHARPARA
P.O. LEGTISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION HIGHER DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
3:THE GOVERNING BODY OF RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
4:AKTER HUSSAIN
LECTURER IN ENGLISH
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON.
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
5:ABDUR RAZZAK
LECTURER IN EDUCATION
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
6:RUZENA KHATUN
LECTURER IN ECONOMICS
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
7:JAHIRUL ISLAM
LOWER DIVISION ASSTT.
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
8:SHAHIL RANA
LIBRARY BEARER
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR R ISLAM (r-4 to 8)
Linked Case : WA/247/2021
ASIR UDDIN AHMED AND 4 ORS.
S/O- LATE GOTU SHEIKH
R/O- VILL.- ABHAYAPURI ROUMARI
P.O. ABHAYAPURI
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
PIN- 783384.
2: DEWAN MD. SHAMSUL ALOM
S/O- LATE ABDUL AWAL DEWAN
R/O- VILL.- BALAIPATHAR
P.O. KALGACHIA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781319.
3: ANOWAR HUSSAIN
S/O- LATE MOHI UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL. AND P.O. ISABPUR
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781321.
4: CHAND MAMUD
S/O- GOHER UDDIN AHMED
R/O- VILL.- DUMERGURI
P.O. LENGISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
5: GOLAM RABBANI
C/O- LATE HAZI KACHAR UDDIN
R/O- VILL.- JHARPARA
P.O. LEGTISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
EDUCATION HIGHER DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY- 6.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
3:THE GOVERNING BODY OF RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
4:AKTER HUSSAIN
LECTURER IN ENGLISH
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON.
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
5:ABDUR RAZZAK
LECTURER IN EDUCATION
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
6:RUZENA KHATUN
LECTURER IN ECONOMICS
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
7:JAHIRUL ISLAM
LOWER DIVISION ASSTT.
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
8:SHAHIL RANA
LIBRARY BEARER
RAJIV GANDHI MEMORIAL COLLEGE
VILL. AND P.O. LENGTISINGA
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783384.
------------
Advocate for : MR A R BHUYAN
Advocate for : SC
HIGHER EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.07.2026 (K.R. Surana, J)
Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for all the private respondents. None appears on call on behalf of the Higher Education Department.
2. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicants who are the appellants in WA/247/2021, have prayed for amendment in the cause title and prayer for memo of the appeal. The nature of amendment sought for is stated in para 7 and para 9 of this interlocutory application.
3. The learned counsel for the private respondents has referred to the objection filed in this matter and opposed the prayer on the ground that if the amendments as prayed for are allowed, it would change the nature and character of the connected appeal. It is also submitted that the private respondents have also filed cross-objection in connection cross- appeal, which is registered as WA/146/2022.
4. Having heard the learned Senior counsel for the applicant and the counsel for the private respondents, the Court is of the considered opinion that if the proposed amendment are allowed, it would not change the nature and character of the connected appeal. Moreover, as the private respondents in the connected appeal have also filed WA/146/2022, there is no likelihood that the private respondents would suffer any prejudice if the prayer for amendments are allowed.
5. Accordingly, prayer for amendment has made in this application stands allowed to the extent as pleaded in para 7 and para 9 of this interlocutory application.
6. The applicant shall file an amended memo of appeal within a period of 2(two) weeks from the date of the order. In the amended Memo of Appeal, the portion which is deleted and substituted shall also be reflected, but struck off so that the nature of the amendment made would be on record.
7. The interlocutory application stands allowed to the extent as indicated above and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant