Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/707/2026 of UBAID ULLAH KHAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM, on 16 July 2026
GAHC010145152026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/707/2026 UBAID ULLAH KHAN S/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF GANDHI BASTI, HOUSE NO. 2, PS SILPUKHURI, DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REP BY
GAHC010145152026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/707/2026
UBAID ULLAH KHAN
S/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN,
RESIDENT OF GANDHI BASTI, HOUSE NO. 2, PS SILPUKHURI, DIST.
KAMRUP M ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM,
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR. M A CHOUDHURY,U U KHAN,MISS. P M
AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./1180/2026
RAHENA BEGUM
W/O KABIR UDDIN
R/O ERALIGOOL
PT.I
P.S. PATHARKANDI
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. A AHMED
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.07.2026
Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. By this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for correction of the common order dated 02.07.2026 passed in connected bail petitions BA/1180/2026, BA/717/2026, BA/1239/2026, BA/1282/2026, BA/1226/2026, BA/1468/2026, BA/748/2026 and BA/1180/2026.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant by drawing attention to paragraph 77 of that order submits that it has been stated therein as disposed of. In this context it is submitted that as the matters have been referred to place before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for constitution of larger Bench, if any; therefore these bail petitions are still pending.
4. Upon perusing the common order dated 02-7-2026, passed in the batch of bail petitions, I find that though the prayer of the petitioners for interim bail was not considered, but they were given the liberty to agitate the same before larger Bench, if any. However, as correctly contended and submitted by the learned counsels for the applicants, the bail petitions have been indicated as disposed of.
5. Upon considering the matter, including the aspect of giving liberty to the petitioners to renew their prayers for interim bail before larger Bench, if any – and having referred the bail petitions to be placed before Hon’ble Chief Justice
– it was inadvertently, mistakenly typed as disposed of, instead of keeping the petitions pending for consideration by larger Bench, if any.
6. In such view of the matter and in the given circumstances, I accept the contentions of the applicants and therefore, the aforesaid typographical error is hereby corrected.
7. The batch of bail petitions – BA/1180/2026, BA/717/2026, BA/1239/2026, BA/1282/2026, BA/1226/2026, BA/1468/2026, BA/748/2026 and BA/1180/2026 – would not stand disposed of and shall remain pending till consideration by a larger Bench, if any.
8. The I/A stands allowed and disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
9. This order shall be read as part of the common order dated 02.07.2026.
10. This order may be placed before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for information.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant