Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./1902/2026 of NAJIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 16 July 2026
GAHC010141722026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1902/2026 NAJIRUL ISLAM S/O-ROFIKUL ISLAM VILL- DHUPAGURI PATHAR. P.S- DHING DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM. PIN-782123 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010141722026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1902/2026
NAJIRUL ISLAM
S/O-ROFIKUL ISLAM VILL- DHUPAGURI PATHAR. P.S- DHING DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM. PIN-782123
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI, MR. H ISLAM,MR J FIRDAUS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.07.2026 Heard Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Najirul Islam, has prayed for bail in connection with Dhing P.S. Case No. 132/2026 under Section 61(2)/316(2)/317(2)/318(4) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 66(C)/66 IT Act.
3. The petitioner was arrested on 25.05.2026 and stated to have been police remand till 30.05.2026 and since then, he has been detained in judicial custody.
4. This is a subsequent bail petition the earlier bal petition was rejected by this Court on 23.06.2026 in BA No. 1523/2026.
5. The case was lodged based on an FIR. The gist of allegations in the FIR is that due to defect in SBI cash deposit machine, the informant made two transactions from two different persons in exchange of being cashed and after receiving the amount, he made an online transaction for the next working day for his brother. Thereafter, his brother also made a transaction and both the accounts were frozen. Later, upon informing the bank, the informant came to know that his account and his brother account were frozen. Subsequently, the present petitioner and other were arrested.
6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that investigation has revealed incriminating material against the petitioner. Further, fairly submits that there is offence of substantial progress in the investigation.
7. Case diary has been produced before the Court and I have perused the relevant portions and I do not find any investigation after the date of last rejection.
8. In the given facts and circumstances and considering the length of detention and also the progress of investigation so far, this petition can be considered at this stage.
9. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioner:
(a) shall co-operate with the remaining investigation.
(b) shall not hamper or temper with the evidence.
(c) shall not commit any illegal activity. Violation of bail conditions entails cancellation of bail.
10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
11. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant