Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/498/2026 of BICHITRA RUHI DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 15 July 2026
GAHC010091382026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/498/2026 BICHITRA RUHI DAS S/O - LT BIPUL RUHI DAS R/O - BETBARI NO. 2, KONWARGAON PS AND DIST - SIVSAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010091382026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/498/2026
BICHITRA RUHI DAS
S/O - LT BIPUL RUHI DAS R/O - BETBARI NO. 2, KONWARGAON PS AND
DIST - SIVSAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
2:PURNIMA KARMAKAR
W/O - RAJU KARMAKAR
R/O - BETBARI NO. 2
KONWARGAON
PS AND DIST - SIVSAGAR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P KATAKI, MS S BARPUJARI,MRS R BEGUM,MS. A LALA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS S SHARMA, LEGAL AID COUNSEL, R2
Linked Case : Crl.A./214/2025
BICHITRA RUHI DAS
S/O - LT BIPUL RUHI DAS
R/O - BETBARI NO. 2
KONWARGAON
PS AND DIST - SIVSAGAR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
REP BY PP
ASSAM
2:PURNIMA KARMAKAR
W/O - RAJU KARMAKAR
R/O - BETBARI NO. 2
KONWARGAON
PS AND DIST - SIVSAGAR
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR P KATAKI
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16-07-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mrs. R. Begum, learned counsel for the applicant prays that she may be allowed to withdraw the application, inasmuch as, the earlier application for suspension of sentence had been rejected and there is no new ground in the present application. Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. P.P. appears for the State, while Ms. S. Sharma, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.2. The prayer of the counsel for the applicant is allowed. I.A. is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant