Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3717/2022 of NILCHANDRA SINGHA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS on 14 July 2026
GAHC010106592022 2026:GAU-AS:9679 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3717/2022 NILCHANDRA SINGHA S/O- LATE THAMBAL SINGHA, R/O- HOUSE NO. 13, MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, PIN- 781171, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010106592022
2026:GAU-AS:9679
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3717/2022
NILCHANDRA SINGHA
S/O- LATE THAMBAL SINGHA, R/O- HOUSE NO. 13, MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, PIN- 781171, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH
BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110011.
2:THE GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING
HEAD QUARTER AT 51 SUB-AREA
NARANGI
GUWAHATI-781027.
3:THE STATION COMMANDER
HEAD QUARTER AT 51 SUB-AREA
NARANGI
GUWAHATI-781027
ASSAM
4:THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMANDANT STATION CELL
HEAD QUARTER AT 51 SUB-AREA
NARANGI
GUWAHATI-781027
ASSAM
5:THE STATION OFFICER (SSO)
STATION CELL
HEAD QUARTER AT 51
SUB-AREA
NARANGI
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-781027
ASSA
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. NBP Sinha Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. AK Dutta, CGC
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.07.2026
Heard Mr. NBP Sinha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. AK Dutta, the learned CGC for the respondents.
2. Mr. NBP Sinha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
4. It is observed that the closure of the instant writ petition shall not preclude the petitioner to participate in the fresh tenders, which have been issued for the shop, in question.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant