Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6616/2016 of MD. RAFIQUDDIN and 9 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 14 July 2026
GAHC010230742016 2026:GAU-AS:9676 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6616/2016 MD. RAFIQUDDIN and 9 ORS. S/O. LT. DEVANATH ULLAH 2: MUSTT. SARUTUN NESSA S/O. LT. HABIB ALI 3: MD. AFTABUDDIN ALI S/O. LT. AYUB ALI 4: MD. AKADDAS
GAHC010230742016
2026:GAU-AS:9676
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6616/2016
MD. RAFIQUDDIN and 9 ORS.
S/O. LT. DEVANATH ULLAH
2: MUSTT. SARUTUN NESSA
S/O. LT. HABIB ALI
3: MD. AFTABUDDIN ALI
S/O. LT. AYUB ALI
4: MD. AKADDAS ALI
S/O. LT. ARAB ALI
5: MAINUDDIN @ MAJIBAR RAHMAN
S/O. MD. MAJUR ALI
6: KUTUB ALI @ FAZIR ALI
S/O. LT. BHERAI MIA
7: MD. SAMSUL HOQUE
S/O. ABDUL KADIR
8: SALIM HUSSIN NOTICE SENT AFTABUDDIN
S/O. LT. TANJID ALI
9: MUBARAK ALI
NOTICE TO KUTUB ALI
S/O. LT
HAJI SHAKIR ALI CHOUDHURY
10: JALALUDDIN
S/O. LT. SARAFUTULLA NOTICE TO SARAFUTULLAH ALL ARE OF VILL.
PACHIM DHANI RAM PATHAR
MOUZA-HOJAI
P.S. HOJAI
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06.
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
HOJAI.
3:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
HOJAI CUM S.D.O. C.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
HOJAI REVENUE CIRCLE
HOJAI
Advocate for the petitioner(s): None appears Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. HK Hazarika For respondent Nos.2, 5 & 7
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.07.2026
None appears on behalf of the petitioners on call.
2. It is seen that on various occasions, the petitioners have chosen not to appear before the Court.
3. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners have lost interest in the instant proceedings, for which, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant