Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/157/2018 of MONJULA MAHANTA AND 4 ORS. Vs RAJESH PRASAD AND ORS. on 14 July 2026
GAHC010074682018 2026:GAU-AS:9673 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/157/2018 MONJULA MAHANTA AND 4 ORS. W/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA MAHANTA, R/O. SANKARPUR, HENGRABARI ROAD, GANESHGURI, GHY., DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: SMT.
GAHC010074682018
2026:GAU-AS:9673
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/157/2018
MONJULA MAHANTA AND 4 ORS.
W/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA MAHANTA, R/O. SANKARPUR, HENGRABARI ROAD, GANESHGURI, GHY., DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2: SMT. ANITA MAHANTA
DAUGHTER IN LAW OF LT. PRABHATR CHANDRA MAHANTA
(W/O. LT. NRIPEN MAHANTA
WHO WAS THE S/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA MAHANTA)
R/O. SANKARPUR
HENGRABARI ROAD
GANESHGURI
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
3: SMT. RITA PEGU (MAHANTA)
D/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA MAHANTA
AT PRESENT W/O. SRI JYOTI PRAKASH PEGU
R/O. NARAKASUR
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M). ASSAM
4: SMT. PRITI MAHANTA KALITA
D/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA MAHANTA
W/O. DR. JOGEN CHANDRA KALITA
R/O. JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
5: DIPAK MAHANTA
S/O. LT. PRABHAT CHANDRA CHANDRA MAHANTA
R/O. SANKARPUR
HENGRABARI ROAD
GANESHGURI
GHY.
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
VERSUS
RAJESH PRASAD AND ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.
2:VIRENDRA MITTAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
3:NABADIP PATHAK
THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER
REVENUE
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
4:AJIT KUMAR KAKATI
CHIEF ENGINEER
P.W.D. (ROADS) ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
5:BHUPEN SARMA
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
P.W.D. (ROADS)
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
6:SRI GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY.-781006
7:SRI SUMIT SATTAWAN
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
HENGRABARI
GUWAHTI-781036
ASSAM
8:SRI SANJIB DALAI
THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER
REVENUE
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI-781001
ASSAM
9:SRI SANJIB SHAM
CHIEF ENGINEER
P.W.D. (ROADS) ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
10:SRI MUNINDRA CHANDRA DEKA
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
P.W.D(ROADS)
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-78100
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. C. Saikia, Sr. Advocate : Ms. R. Saikia, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, Addl. AG, Assam : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA, Assam
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.07.2026
Heard Mr. R. C. Saikia, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. D. Nath, the learned Senior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and
3. I have also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
2. In pursuance to the order dated 19.06.2026, the amount of Rs.13,78,030/- have already been transferred to the Petitioner No.3’s Bank Account.
3. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains in the instant contempt application.
4. Mr. R. C. Saikia, the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the calculation have not been made in terms with the judgment passed by the Reference Court. It is the opinion of this Court that these aspects can be very well taken up before the Executing Court if so advised.
5. Accordingly, this Court does not find any further requirement for continuation of the contempt proceedings for which the instant contempt proceedings stands closed.
6. Before parting with the records, this Court observes that the closure of the contempt proceedings shall not prejudice the Petitioners to approach the Executing Court, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant