Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5602/2019 of JAHANARA BEGUM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 14 July 2026
GAHC010184322019 2026:GAU-AS:9666 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5602/2019 JAHANARA BEGUM D/O- LATE ABDUL HAKIM, R/O- VILL- SAIDORIA, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782125 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE
GAHC010184322019
2026:GAU-AS:9666
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5602/2019
JAHANARA BEGUM
D/O- LATE ABDUL HAKIM, R/O- VILL- SAIDORIA, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782125
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, ELECTION DEPTT CUM CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
NAGAON
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782001
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CUM CRCR(NRC)
RUPAHI REVENUE CIRCLE
JURIA
NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782125
4:MD. ABDUL SALAM
S/O- LATE ABDUL RAHMAN
R/O- VILL- SAIDORIA
P.O- SAIDORIA
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782125
5:MD. NAZRUL ISLAM
S/O- LATE MAMTAZ UDDIN
R/O- VILL- SAIDORIA
P.O- SAIDORIA
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 78212
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Ms. M Devi Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. M Bhattacharjee Mr. SS Roy B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.07.2026
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the termination of the petitioner’s appointment as the Booth Level Officer and the appointment of the respondent No.5 as the Booth Level Officer.
2. Ms. M Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that the Booth Level Officers were appointed at that point of time on account of updation of the NRC and the process of updation of the NRC is no longer there and as such no effective directions can be passed in the present writ proceedings.
3. This Court has also taken note of that at present no steps have been taken for any updation of the NRC and as such, it is the opinion of this Court no effective writ can be passed in the instant writ proceedings.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition, therefore, stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant