Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5354/2020 of LUT AHMED BARBHUIYA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 14 July 2026
GAHC010180652020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5354/2020 LUT AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O. LT. HARIS ALI BARBHUIYA, VILL. RANGIRGHAT, P.O. SONAI, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. TO BE REP. BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010180652020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5354/2020
LUT AHMED BARBHUIYA
S/O. LT. HARIS ALI BARBHUIYA, VILL. RANGIRGHAT, P.O. SONAI, DIST.
CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
TO BE REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (REGISTRATION) AND D.M. DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE PERMANENT COMMITTEE
REP. BY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
ASSAM
RUPNAGAR
GUWAHATI-32.
3:THE ADDL. SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND D.M. (REGISTRATION) DEPTT.
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
4:THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR
CACHAR SILCHAR
ASSAM.
5:SHAHID AHMED MAZUMDER
S/O. MD. ALAUDDIN MAZUMDER
R/O. VILL. MAZIRGRAM
Page No.# 2/2
P.O. SONAIMUKH
P.S. SONAI
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MR. J N ISLAM,MS A BEGUM,MR. A M
BARBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, MR B DEORI,GA, ASSAM,MR. M H
LASKAR,MR. S ROY,MR M HOSSAIN
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.07.2026 Heard Ms. S. R. Mazarbhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5; Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent and Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue Department. Ms. S. R. Mazarbhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant