Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/354/2015 of SMTI MAMANI DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 13 July 2026
GAHC010007502015 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/354/2015 SMTI MAMANI DAS W/O SRI DHANIRAM NATH, VILL. and P.O. SARUPETA, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781318 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010007502015
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/354/2015
SMTI MAMANI DAS
W/O SRI DHANIRAM NATH, VILL. and P.O. SARUPETA, P.S.
PATACHARKUCHI, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781318
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
IRRIGATION DEPTT.
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GHY-3
3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
GUWAHATI MECHANICAL CIRCLE
IRRIGATION
ULUBARI
GHY-7
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TIHU DAKHIN BAJALI MECHANICAL DIVISION
IRRIGATION
TIHU
DIST- NALBARI
PIN-781371
5:PRATAP KALITA
S/O LT. PHATIK KALITA
C/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Page No.# 2/2
TIHU DAKHIN BAJALI MECHANICAL DIVISION
IRRIGATION
TIHU
DIST- NALBARI
PIN-78137
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRB D SARMA, MR.U K DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, DR.B AHMED
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14.07.2026 Heard Mr. U. K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Irrigation Department. Mr. U. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner does not wish to press the petition any further. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the writ petition stands closed on being withdrawn. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant