Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6021/2015 of SUNIL MITTAL Vs CHAIRPERSON AND ANR on 12 July 2026
GAHC010022362015 2026:GAU-AS:9541 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6021/2015 SUNIL MITTAL DY. GENERAL MANAGER G/ESTATE OFFICER, N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GHY-11, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS CHAIRPERSON AND ANR ASSAM STATE
GAHC010022362015
2026:GAU-AS:9541
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6021/2015
SUNIL MITTAL
DY. GENERAL MANAGER G/ESTATE OFFICER, N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GHY-11, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
CHAIRPERSON AND ANR
ASSAM STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN, GUWAHATI
2:SMT. BIRAJA DEVI DAS
W/O. BANAJIT KR. DAS
R/O. CENTRAL GOTANAGAR
RAILWAY QUARTER NO. 43
MALIGAON
GHY-781011
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. SC Biswas Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. BJ Talukdar, Senior Advocate Mr. PK Medhi for respondent No.1.
Ms. B Saikia for respondent No.2.
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.07.2026
Heard Mr. SC Biswas, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BJ Talukdar, the learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. PK Medhi, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Ms. B Saikia, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent No.2.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the complaint proceedings being Complaint Case No.ASCW.245/2014, which has been initiated by the respondent No.1 on the basis of the allegations made by the respondent No.2.
3. Ms. B Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 submits that the matter has already been amicably settled between the respondent No.2 and the petitioner and, therefore, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the present writ petition. Ms. Saikia, the learned counsel further submitted that the said complaint proceedings being Complaint Case No.ASCW.245/2014, therefore, no longer continues.
4. Mr. PK Medhi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 submits that he has no instructions in that regard.
5. Considering that the matter between the petitioner and the respondent No.2 has been amicably settled, it is the opinion of this Court that the further continuation of the complaint proceedings being Complaint Case No.ASCW.245/2014 cannot be allowed to be continued which would amount to the abuse of the process of the Court. Accordingly, the complaint proceedings being Complaint Case No.ASCW.245/2014 stands quashed.
6. Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant