Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3614/2026 of MRIDUL DAS AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 12 July 2026
GAHC010137782026 2026:GAU-AS:9513 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3614/2026 MRIDUL DAS AND ANR S/O JATIN DAS, R/O VILLAGE- GOPALPUR PUB-DADARA, P.O.- DADARA, P.S.- HAJO, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781104. 2: NABA KUMAR DAS
GAHC010137782026
2026:GAU-AS:9513
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3614/2026
MRIDUL DAS AND ANR
S/O JATIN DAS, R/O VILLAGE- GOPALPUR PUB-DADARA, P.O.- DADARA, P.S.- HAJO, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781104.
2: NABA KUMAR DAS
VILLAGE- 2 NO. PACHIM DADARA
P.O.- DADARA
P.S.- HAJO
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781104
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
TRIBES AFFAIRS (P) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DIRECTOR
TRIBES AFFAIRS (P) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 781039.
5:THE PRESIDENT
UTTAR KAMRUP JILA ANUSUCHIT JATI PARISHAD
DAMDAMA
VILL- CHECHAMUKH
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781104
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS, D BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.07.2026
Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to provide them Schedule Caste Status and its Certificate thereof. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that this writ petition can be disposed of like another writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2263/2020, wherein the petitioners were similarly situated like the petitioners herein.
3. The facts of the case is that though the petitioners’ fathers, grandfathers have waived their reservation rights in the year 1951 NRC by marking ‘X’ in the caste column, yet the petitioners belonging to the Schedule Caste category, cannot be discarded of their recognition.
4. Before entering into the merits of the case, pertinent that Mr. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate draws the attention of this Court to the Office Memorandum dated
08.08.2022, whereby Guidelines have been prescribed for issuance of Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Classes/More Other Backward Class Certificates. He has further submitted that application has to be submitted in the requisite form prescribed in the aforesaid Office Memorandum in order for issuance of Schedule Caste Certificate.
5. Admittedly, in the present case, no such application under the Office Memorandum dated 08.08.2022 has been submitted. That being so, this Court is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file requisite applications in the prescribed form, in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 08.08.2022 and as and when such applications are being filed, the concerned respondent authorities shall dispose of the said applications in accordance with law.
6. Needless to clarify that the said exercise shall be completed within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of such applications.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant