Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/7635/2022 of AJIT KUMAR NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 12 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010242232022 2026:GAU-AS:9550 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7635/2022 AJIT KUMAR NATH S/O LATE GOPAL NATH, R/O WARD NO. 2, HOWLY TOWN, VILL.- MAIRAMARA, P.O. AND P.S.- HOWLY, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781316. VERSUS

GAHC010242232022

2026:GAU-AS:9550

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/7635/2022

AJIT KUMAR NATH

S/O LATE GOPAL NATH,

R/O WARD NO. 2, HOWLY TOWN,

VILL.- MAIRAMARA, P.O. AND P.S.- HOWLY,

DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781316.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

NOTICE THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM

CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY

FOREST AND ENVIRENMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006.

3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF

FOREST FORCE

ASSAM

PANJABARI

GUWAHATI- 781037.

4:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

LOWER ASSAM ZONE

GUWAHATI- 781001.

5:THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

CENTRAL ASSAM CIRCLE

GUWAHATI- 781029.

6:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

NORTH KAMRUP DIVIDION

RANGIA

DIST.- KAMRUP.

7:KHANDAKAR JIYAUR RAHMAN

S/O- LT. KHANDAKAR MAJIBUR RAHMAN

R/O- KALABHANGA WARD NO.4

P.O- BARPETA ROAD

P.S- BARPETA ROAD

DIST- BARPETA

ASSAM

PIN-781315

Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. UK Das Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. D Gogoi, Standing Counsel, Forest Department, Govt. of Assam B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.07.2026

Mr. UK Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the entire amount as mentioned in the order dated 24.06.2026. Mr. Das, the learned counsel, therefore, submits that the petitioner would not like to further pursue the instant writ petition.

2. Mr. D Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Forest Department.

3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed.

4. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead