Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1675/2014 of SMTI SURABALA DEY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS on 12 July 2026
GAHC010184782014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1675/2014 SMTI SURABALA DEY W/O LT. GOPI CHARAN DEY, R/O LANKA, L.P. ROAD, RUPNAGAR, GALLI NO.6, H/NO.346, W/NO.2, P.S. LANKA DISTRICT- NAGAON VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010184782014
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1675/2014
SMTI SURABALA DEY
W/O LT. GOPI CHARAN DEY, R/O LANKA, L.P. ROAD, RUPNAGAR, GALLI
NO.6, H/NO.346, W/NO.2, P.S. LANKA DISTRICT- NAGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS
THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE AND REHABILITATION, ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND AND RECORDS
ASSAM
RUPNAGAR
GHY-32
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
KARBIANGLONG DISTRICT DIMA HASAO AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
4:THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER C
HOJAI
P.S. HOJAI
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
LANKA REVENUE CIRCLE
6:THE LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
LANKA
NAGAON
ASSAM
7:THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD LANKA
NAGAON
ASSAM
8:PRANESH PAUL
S/O -
9:XXXXXX
STRIKE OUT THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO. 9 AS PER THE HON'BLE
COURT'S ORDER DATED 24.07.2023.
10:LAKU PAUL
S/O SRI MANTU PAUL
11:XXXXXX
STRIKE OUT THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO. 11 AS PER THE HON'BLE
COURT'S ORDER DATED 24.07.2023.
12:ASHISH DEY
S/O LT. MUKUNDA DEY
ALL ARE THE R/O LANKAGAON
W/NO.2
RUPNAGAR
P.O. and P.S. LANKA
DIST- NAGAON
ASSA
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. H. Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Goswami, Govt. Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
13.07.2026 Mr. M. H. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is not interested to pursue the instant proceedings.
2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant