Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/705/2022 of MANITA DEVI Vs DR. BIJOYA CHOUDHURY AND 5 ORS on 12 July 2026
GAHC010241212022 2026:GAU-AS:9484 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/705/2022 MANITA DEVI D/O. MADHAB CHANDRA BHATTA, VILL. BORDEKPAR, P.O. SONESWAR, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN-781126. VERSUS DR. BIJOYA CHOUDHURY AND 5
GAHC010241212022
2026:GAU-AS:9484
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/705/2022
MANITA DEVI
D/O. MADHAB CHANDRA BHATTA, VILL. BORDEKPAR, P.O. SONESWAR, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN-781126.
VERSUS
DR. BIJOYA CHOUDHURY AND 5 ORS
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:SAMIR SINHA
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:PHANINDRA JIDUNG
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-781019.
4:PRABIN CH. RABHA
DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
RANGIA
KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781354.
5:NARAYAN KONWAR
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
6:SMT. SURANJANA SENAPATI
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
KAHILIPARA
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-78101
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA, MR. K KALITA,MS L HMAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. N PHUKAN, MR. R MAZUMDAR (r-5),MR. N J KHATANIAR
(r-5),MR. D SAIKIA (r-5),SC, ELEM. EDU
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.07.2026 Heard Mr. A. Pathak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. N. J. Khataniar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5. Mr. A. Pathak, learned counsel, submits that the judgment & order dated 06.08.2015 passed in WP(C) No. 1288/2014 and Order dated 01.12.2021 passed in Review Petition No. 85/2018, alleged to have been not complied with in the present contempt proceedings, have, in the meantime, been complied with. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt proceedings.
Accordingly, the contempt matter stands closed. The notice issued to the alleged contemnor stands discharged.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant