Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3429/2026 of NAYANA BORDOLOI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 25 June 2026
GAHC010126132026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3429/2026 NAYANA BORDOLOI AND ANR DAUGHTER OF SRI MANIRAM BORDOLOI, RESIDENT OF BUTIKURA, DAB NARIKALI, P.O. DEBNARIKALI, P.S. KAMPUR, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM,
GAHC010126132026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3429/2026
NAYANA BORDOLOI AND ANR
DAUGHTER OF SRI MANIRAM BORDOLOI, RESIDENT OF BUTIKURA, DAB
NARIKALI, P.O. DEBNARIKALI, P.S. KAMPUR, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782426.
2: AHADUR RAHMAN
SON OF LATE- ATAUR RAHMAN
RESIDENT OF VILL- BAR-MANIPUR
P.O. BAR-MANIPUR
P.S. JAJORI
DISTRICT- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782142
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER- CUM- DISTRICT MARRIAGE OFFICER
NAGAON
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782001.
3:THE MARRIAGE OFFICER/ SUB- REGISTRAR
KAMPUR
KAMPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
KAMPUR
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782426.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
NAGAON
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782001.
5:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
KAMPUR POLICE STATION
KAMPUR
DISTRICT NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782426
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T A CHOUDHURY, MR M HOQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26-06-2026 Mr. T.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition.
Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 – 5 are present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant