Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/1867/2026 of NASIMA AKTAR BARBHUIYA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 24 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010288642025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1867/2026 NASIMA AKTAR BARBHUIYA DAUGHTER OF LATE SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDIPUR PART-II, P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR, P.S. ALGAPUR,, DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010288642025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1867/2026

NASIMA AKTAR BARBHUIYA

DAUGHTER OF LATE SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE

CHANDIPUR PART-II, P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR, P.S. ALGAPUR,, DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788150

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT

(B), DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006

2:THE CHAIRMAN

STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) FOR APPOINTMENT ON

COMPASSIONATE GROUND

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006

3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM

PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006

4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC)

HAILAKANDI

REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

HAILAKANDI

ASSAM- 788151

5:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER

Page No.# 2/2

HAILAKANDI

P.O. AND DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI

ASSAM- 78815

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H A LASKAR, A. H. AHMED,MS D DUTTA

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 25.06.2026 Heard Ms. S. Khatun, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H. A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Baruah, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent. Ms. S. Khatun, learned counsel submits that the office of Mr. H. A. Laskar, has received instructions from the petitioner not to press the instant writ petition accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead