Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2679/2026 of SMTI AMITA NATH MAZUMDER Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 24 June 2026
GAHC010099482026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2679/2026 SMTI AMITA NATH MAZUMDER , DAUGHTER OF AVAY NATH MAZUMDER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILL-RONGPUR PT-I, PO- APIN, PS-LALA, DISTRICTHAILAKANDI, ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010099482026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2679/2026
SMTI AMITA NATH MAZUMDER
, DAUGHTER OF AVAY NATH MAZUMDER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILL-RONGPUR PT-I, PO- APIN, PS-LALA, DISTRICTHAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788161, PHONE9365188344.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, REVENUE AND
DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, PIN-781006, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DISTRICTHAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788151
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
KATLICHERRA REVENUE CIRCLE
DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN- 788151.
4:THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR
HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788151
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T A CHOUDHURY, MR. AHMAD SAKIR,MR. A Y
CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.06.2026 Mr. A. Sakir, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has received instructions from the petitioner not to press the writ petition. Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1 and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sakir, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant