Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./1645/2026 of HAFIJUL ISLAM AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010124982026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1645/2026 HAFIJUL ISLAM AND ANR SON OF SUBAHAN ALI 2: ABDUL KALAM SON OF LATE TARIBULLA SHEIKH BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ISLAMPUR POLICE STATION- JOGIGHOPA

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010124982026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./1645/2026

HAFIJUL ISLAM AND ANR

SON OF SUBAHAN ALI

2: ABDUL KALAM

SON OF LATE TARIBULLA SHEIKH BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ISLAMPUR

POLICE STATION- JOGIGHOPA

DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K BARMAN, MR. R KONWAR,MR D PEGU,MR H ALI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.06.2026

1. Heard Mr. U. K. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. B. Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.

2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners, namely, Hafijul Islam and Abdul Kalam, praying for Page No.# 2/2 grant of bail in connection with Jogighipa P.S. Case No.79/2026 under Sections 61(2)/3(5) of BNS read with Section 13(1)/14/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

3. The petitioners are stated to be the owner and cook respectively of the hotel where alleged meat in the nature of beef was found in violation of the provisions of section 8 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act.

4. The case diary has been received.

5. The Prosecution submits that investigation has progressed and statements of witnesses have been recorded.

6. In that circumstances, it is provided that the accused petitioners named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.30,000/-each with one suitable surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioners:

(a) shall co-operate the remaining investigation.

(b) Shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence

7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.

8. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead