Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3375/2026 of SHRI RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 24 June 2026
GAHC010098642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3375/2026 SHRI RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE RAM MURAT CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF REHABARI GUWALA PATTY, H. N- 01 BYE LANE- 2, P.S.- PALTAN BAZAR, P.O.- REHABARI,
GAHC010098642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3375/2026
SHRI RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY
SON OF LATE RAM MURAT CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF REHABARI
GUWALA PATTY, H. N- 01 BYE LANE- 2, P.S.- PALTAN BAZAR, P.O.- REHABARI, GUWAHATI- 781008 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
OF HOME, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007
DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
3:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CITY
KHANAPARA
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI- 22
DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
4:THE OFFICER- IN -CHARGE
PALTAN BAZAR POLICE STATION
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI 8
DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
5:SRI PRABHAKAR CHOUDHARY @ SHIVA
SON OF SRI RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY
RESIDENT OF REHABARI
HOUSE NO 18
GUWALA PATTY
BYE LANE 2
P.S- PALTANBAZAR
P.O- REHABARI
GUWAHATI- 8
DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
6:SMT SARASWATI CHOUDHARY ALIAS SARASWATI RAI
WIFE OF SHRI PRABHAKAR CHOUDHARY
RESIDENT OF REHABARI
HOUSE NO 18
GUWALA PATTY
BYE LANE 2
P.S- PALTANBAZAR
P.O- REHABARI
GUWAHATI -8
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : L K BORAH, MR. D K BORAH,C KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.06.2026 Mr. L.K. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has instruction from the petitioner not to press this writ petition. Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE
Comparing Assistant