Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3315/2026 of SRI DINESH DAS AND OTHER Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010121092026 2026:GAU-AS:9184 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3315/2026 SRI DINESH DAS AND OTHER S/O. LATE JANAK DAS. 2: SRI RAJ KISHOR PURBEY S/O NARAYAN PURBEY BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ULUBARI BIRUBARI DR. B. R.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010121092026

2026:GAU-AS:9184

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3315/2026

SRI DINESH DAS AND OTHER

S/O. LATE JANAK DAS.

2: SRI RAJ KISHOR PURBEY

S/O NARAYAN PURBEY

BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ULUBARI BIRUBARI

DR. B. R. AMEDKAR NAGAR

MOUZA- ULUBARI

P.S. PALTAN BAZAR

DISTRICT- KAMRUP M

ASSAM. HAVING COMMON CAUSE OF ACTION

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

KAMRUP M

HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI-781036

ASSAM

3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE

GUWAHATI- 781007

Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A MATLIB, MR R DHAR

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24.06.2026 Heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; Mr. S.R. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. Mr. Dhar has submitted that after filing of this writ petition, speaking orders have been passed recently, in terms of the Judgment and Order dated 07.11.2024 passed in the batch of writ petitions including W.P.[C.] no. 7399/2022 and W.P.[C.] no. 3715/2020 preferred by these two petitioners, and those speaking orders are made subject-matter of challenge in writ petitions already filed. In the above view of the matter Mr. Dhar has submitted that this writ petition can be closed as the speaking orders are being challenged in other writ petitions. In view of the above submissions made by Mr. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead