Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2136/2026 of MR KARIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA Vs SAIDUR RAHMAN on 23 June 2026
GAHC010126882026 2026:GAU-AS:9233 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2136/2026 MR KARIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O LATE RAHIM UDDIN BARBHUYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANAKPUR PART-II, SILCHAR, P.O. P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT CACHAR,
GAHC010126882026
2026:GAU-AS:9233
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2136/2026
MR KARIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA
S/O LATE RAHIM UDDIN BARBHUYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
KANAKPUR PART-II, SILCHAR, P.O. P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788001 AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT REGENT PARADISE, FLAT NO. A1, BLOCK-2B, BHATAPARA, GUWAHATI-28, DISTRICT KAMRUP
M, ASSAM
VERSUS
SAIDUR RAHMAN
S/O LATE MAJIR ALI, RESIDENT OF P.D. CHALIHA ROAD, SILPUKHURI, BYE-LANE NO. 13 HIDYATPUR, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN-
781003.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THEGOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (METRO)
GUWAHATI-781036.
5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BUILDINGS)
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/5
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003.
6:THE DIRECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES
ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GHY-781036.
7:THE UNDER SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE (L.R.) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GHY-781006.
8:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI.
9:THE GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005.
10:THE PRINCIPAL
GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
BHANGAGARH
GHY-781005.
11:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (M.C.C. DIVISION)
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005
Linked Case : WP(C)/6131/2024
SAIDUR RAHMAN
S/O- LATE MAJIR ALI
R/O- P.D. CHALIHA ROAD
SILPUKHURI
BYE LANE NO. 13
(HIDYATPUR)
DIST. KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781003.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (METRO)
GUWAHATI-781036.
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BUILDINGS)
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003.
5:THE DIRECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES
ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GHY-781036.
6:THE UNDER SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE (L.R.) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GHY-781006.
7:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI.
8:THE GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
BHANGAGARH
9:THE PRINCIPAL
GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
BHANGAGARH
GHY-781005.
10:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (M.C.C. DIVISION)
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Alam, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. C. Saikia, Sr. Advocate Mr. S. Das, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
24.06.2026
The instant application is filed by the applicant seeking leave of this Court to be arrayed him as a Respondent to the accompanying writ petition.
2. The reason as to why the Applicant wants to be arrayed as the party Respondent to the accompanying writ petition is that on account of the pendency of the accompanying writ petition, the Applicant has not received certain compensation.
3. This Court duly takes note of the contents of the writ proceedings wherein it is the specific case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner is the khatiandar in respect of 7 bighas 2 kathas 5 lechas of land of Dag No.326(old)/1117(new) of KP Patta No.10 of village-Ulubari, Mouza- Ulubari in the district of Kamrup (Metro), Assam. The said land has no relevance with the land in which the Applicant is seeking for compensation.
4. Under such circumstances, it is therefore the opinion of this Court that the Applicant is neither a necessary nor a proper party to the accompanying writ petition for which the Application stands rejected.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant