Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2069/2026 of ABDUL KADER Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 June 2026
GAHC010092792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2069/2026 ABDUL KADER S/O-RAHMAT ALI R/O-VILLAGE-KUTHARI JHAR KALAPANI BAZAR P.S - KUTHARI JHAR DISTRICT- BAKSA ASSAM PIN -781315. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO
GAHC010092792026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2069/2026
ABDUL KADER
S/O-RAHMAT ALI
R/O-VILLAGE-KUTHARI JHAR
KALAPANI BAZAR
P.S - KUTHARI JHAR
DISTRICT- BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN -781315.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
2:CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
BARPETA ROAD BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
ROAD BRANCH P.O P.S- BARPETA ROAD
DISTBARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781315.
3:OFFICER IN CHARGE
BARPETA ROAD POLICE STATION
DIST- BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-781315
4:SR POLICE INSPECTOR
SOLAPUR CITY CYBER POLICE STATION
DIST- SOLAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
PIN-413003.
Advocate for : Mr M U Ahmed
Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.06.2026
Heard Mr. M.U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant-writ petitioner; Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 1 & 3; and Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. The instant application is filed seeking impleadment of the following authority :- ‘Senior Police Inspector, Solapur City Cyber Police Station, District – Solapur, Maharashtra, Pin – 413003.’ as the party-respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2520/2026. The applicant as the writ petitioner has preferred the accompanying writ petition assailing an action on the part of the opposite party-respondent no. 2 Bank in that a Bank Account maintained by the applicant-writ petitioner at Barpeta Road Branch of the opposite party-respondent no. 2 Bank has been kept on hold on instruction received from the proposed party-respondent no. 4. As the proposed party-respondent no. 4 appears to be a necessary party for adjudication of the issues raised in the accompanying writ petition, the instant application is allowed. The learned counsel for the applicant-writ petitioner is to file an amended Cause-Title in terms of the Notification no. 79 dated 19.06.2023 within 3 [three] working days from today. On submission of the amended Cause-Title, the Registry shall carry out the necessary correction in the Cause-Title as well as in the CIS. JUDGE Comparing Assistant