Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2053/2023 of JOY SINGH AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 23 June 2026
GAHC010071742023 2026:GAU-AS:9237 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2053/2023 JOY SINGH AND ANR S/O- IBOTOMBI SINGH, VILL.- JOYPUR PT.-II, PO. AND P.S. JOYPUR, DIST. CACHAR, PIN- 788107. 2: MERI SINGHA D/O- RANJIT SINGHA VILL.-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010071742023
2026:GAU-AS:9237
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2053/2023
JOY SINGH AND ANR
S/O- IBOTOMBI SINGH, VILL.- JOYPUR PT.-II, PO. AND P.S. JOYPUR, DIST.
CACHAR, PIN- 788107.
2: MERI SINGHA
D/O- RANJIT SINGHA
VILL.- LATHIGRAM (KALYANIGRAM)
P.O. LATHIGRAM
P.S. MALUGRAM
DIST. CACHAR
PIN- 788030
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF
HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CACHAR
SILCHAR-788001.
3:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
MALUGRAM POLICE STATION
DIST. CACHAR
PIN- 788001.
4:RANJIT SINGHA
S/O- GOURMONI SINGHA
VILL.- LATHIGRAM (KALYANIGRAM)
P.O. LATHIGRAM
P.S. MALUGRAM
Page No.# 2/2
DIST. CACHAR
PIN- 788030
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. A Roshid Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. M Chetia, Govt. Advocate, Assam B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.06.2026
Mr. A Roshid, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that nothing further remains in the instant writ petition, inasmuch as, the case which has been filed against the petitioners, the final report has already been submitted on 30.11.2023 holding inter alia, that no criminal case has been made out against the petitioners.
2. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant writ petition and the same stands closed.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant