Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/250/2024 of SAHIDUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 23 June 2026
GAHC010050872024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/250/2024 SAHIDUL ISLAM S/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ, R/O SATRA KOLARA, P.S.- BAGHBOR, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. TO BE REP. BY THE P.P.,
GAHC010050872024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/250/2024
SAHIDUL ISLAM
S/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ,
R/O SATRA KOLARA, P.S.- BAGHBOR, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
TO BE REP. BY THE P.P., ASSAM.
2:RAMEEZUDDIN RAHMAN
S/O LATE SUKUR ALI
R/O MILANPUR NO. 1 MASZID
P.S.- CHANDMARI
DIST.- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR. I U CHOWDHURY,MR A AHMED,U U
KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS A HUSSAIN (R-2),MR I CHAKMA (R-2),MS H
BETALA (R-2),MR. S. K. CHAKMA (R-2) ,MS N DEKA (R-2),MR A.K. HAJONG (R-2),MS. D
GHOSH (R-2)
Linked Case : Crl.A./72/2024
SAHIDUL ISLAM
S/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ
R/O SATRA KOLARA
P.S.- BAGHBOR
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
TO BE REP. BY THE P.P.
ASSAM.
2:RAMEEZUDDIN RAHMAN
S/O LATE SUKUR ALI
R/O MILANPUR NO. 1 MASZID
P.S.- CHANDMARI
DIST.- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN-
------------
Advocate for : MR. A AHMED
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.06.2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The instant application under Section 389 Cr.PC seeks suspension of execution of the sentence passed upon the applicant pursuant to the impugned Judgment & Order dated 07.02.2024 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in Sessions Special Case No. 72/2021.
3. The applicant’ counsel submits that the learned Trial Court has recorded the evidence of the victim, who is four and a half years old, to the effect that what had befallen the victim girl had not been stated by the victim. The only thing that had been stated by the victim was that the appellant was a “bodmas” and that he should be beaten up. Further, he had opened up her panty and made her sit on the bed.
4. On considering the above, along with the evidence of the Doctor (PW-5), who stated that the hymen was reddened and tender, with an old tear at 6 o’clock position, besides the vagina also being reddened and tender, we are of the view that the prayer for suspension of the sentence cannot be allowed at this stage.
5. The application is accordingly rejected.
6. Any observations and findings made in this order shall not be construed to be the final observations and findings of this Court at the time of the final hearing of the appeal.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant