Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7668/2022 of MANOJ KR DAS Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS on 22 June 2026
GAHC010243372022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7668/2022 MANOJ KR DAS S/O- SRI SIBA RAM DAS, R/O- GOTANAGAR, P.S.- JALUKBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781033. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS TO BE
GAHC010243372022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7668/2022
MANOJ KR DAS
S/O- SRI SIBA RAM DAS,
R/O- GOTANAGAR, P.S.- JALUKBARI,
DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM,
PIN- 781033.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA,
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS,
RAIL BHAWAN, RAISINA ROAD,
NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001.
2:THE RAILWAY BOARD
TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
RAIL BHAWAN
RAISINA ROAD
NEW DELHI
PIN- 110001.
3:THE DIG (ESTABLISHMENT)
RAILWAY BOARD
RAIL BHAWAN
RAISINA ROAD
NEW DELHI
PIN- 110001.
4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE
RAIL BHAVAN
RAISINA ROAD
NEW DELHI
PIN- 110001.
5:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI- 781011
ASSAM.
6:THE STAFF OFFICER TO PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI- 781011
ASSAM.
7:ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL
HEAD QUARTER
RAIL BHAWAN
RAISINA ROAD
NEW DELHI
PIN- 110001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I RAFIQUE, MS A AFREEN
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S K MEDHI,SC, RAILWAY
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.06.2026 Heard Ms. N. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. K. Medhi, learned Dy. S. G. I. for the respondents. Ms. N.Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant