Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/295/2025 of BALJIT SINGH AND ANR Vs SYED AMEENUL ALAM AND ANR on 22 June 2026
GAHC010116712025 2026:GAU-AS:9211 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/295/2025 BALJIT SINGH AND ANR S/O MOHANJIT SINGH, LAKHTOKIA, DANISH ROAD, FANCY BAZAR MARKET, GUWAHATI, PIN-781001, ASSAM 2: INDERJIT SINGH S/O MOHANJIT
GAHC010116712025
2026:GAU-AS:9211
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/295/2025
BALJIT SINGH AND ANR
S/O MOHANJIT SINGH, LAKHTOKIA, DANISH ROAD, FANCY BAZAR
MARKET, GUWAHATI, PIN-781001, ASSAM
2: INDERJIT SINGH
S/O MOHANJIT SINGH
LAKHTOKIA
DANISH ROAD
FANCY BAZAR MARKET
GUWAHATI
PIN-781001
ASSA
VERSUS
SYED AMEENUL ALAM AND ANR
S/O LATE SYED SHAMSUL ALAM, R/O S.S. ROAD, LAKHTOKIA, GUWAHATI-781001
2:SYEDA REHANA ALAM
W/O SYED AMEENUL ALAM
R/O S.S. ROAD
LAKHTOKIA
GUWAHATI-78100
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate : Mr. R. J. Das, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Mozumder, Sr. Advocate : Mr. B. D. Deka, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.06.2026
This is an application alleging wilful and deliberate violation to the order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the learned Coordinate Bench in WP(C) No.6119/2024.
2. The allegations made in the instant application is that the directions which were passed in Paragraph No. 17 of the order dated 18.12.2024 in WP(C) No.6119/2024 have not been complied with by the Respondents in the instant proceedings.
3. This Court had already vide a separate judgment and order dated 23.06.2026 dismissed the writ petition being WP(C) No.6119/2024 and had also vacated the interim orders passed therein.
4. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition as well as the interim orders having been vacated, the directions so passed in the order dated 18.12.2024 in WP(C) No.6119/2024 more particularly at Paragraph No.17, no longer continues to hold the field.
5. It is also very relevant to take note of that the contempt jurisdiction is between the contemnor and this Court and it is the opinion of this Court that after vacating the interim order dated 18.12.2024, there is no necessity for this Court to further pursue the instant proceedings.
6. Accordingly, the instant contempt proceedings stands dropped.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant