Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2073/2026 of SMTI BANA TALUKDAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 June 2026
GAHC010094472026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2073/2026 SMTI BANA TALUKDAR W/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR VILL. HATKHOLA ANANDABAZAR P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST. BAKSA PIN- 788720 2: SMTI RUNU TALUKDAR /O LATE HITESH
GAHC010094472026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2073/2026
SMTI BANA TALUKDAR
W/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR
VILL. HATKHOLA
ANANDABAZAR
P.S. BARPETA ROAD
DIST. BAKSA
PIN- 788720
2: SMTI RUNU TALUKDAR
/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR VILL. HATKHOLA
ANANDABAZAR P.S. BARPETA ROAD
DIST. BAKSASMTI. PRANASMITA TALUK
3: SMTI PRANASMITA TALUKDAR
D/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR VILL. HATKHOLA
ANANDABAZAR P.S. BARPETA ROAD
DIST. BAKSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT
POLICE RESERVE
BARPETA OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-30/1510 - MARUTI GYPSY
3:SRI PRASENJIT BRAHMA
S/O LATE JALESWAR BRAHMA VILL. RAMCHARTARI
P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST. BARPETA ASSAM DRIVER OF THE MARUTI
GYPSY VIDE D/L NO. 2926/NB/2006/MISC VALID UP TO 04/05/2009
4:THE COLLECTOR
KAMRUP METRO OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
BAKIJAI BRANCH
LICHUBAGAN
GUWAHATI .RESPON
------------
Advocate for : MS D D ROY
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Linked Case : WP(C)/2825/2026
SMTI BANA TALUKDAR AND 2 ORS
W/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR, VILL. HATKHOLA, ANANDABAZAR, P.S.
BARPETA ROAD, DIST. BAKSA, PIN- 788720.
2: SMTI RUNU TALUKDAR
D/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR
ANANDABAZAR
P.S. BARPETA ROAD
DIST. BAKSA
PIN- 788720.
3: SMTI PRANASMITA TALUKDAR
D/O LATE HITESH TALUKDAR
VILL. HATKHOLA
ANANDABAZAR
P.S. BARPETA ROAD
DIST. BAKSA
PIN- 788720
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT
POLICE RESERVE
BARPETA (OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-30/1510 - MARUTI GYPSY)
PIN- 788270.
Page No.# 3/4
3:PRASENJIT BRAHMA
S/O LATE JALESWAR BRAHMA
VILL. RAMCHARTARI
P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST. BARPETA ASSAM
(DRIVER OF THE MARUTI GYPSY VIDE D/L NO. 2926/NB/2006/MISC VALID
UP TO 04/05/2009)
PIN- 788270
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS D D ROY, MS. M GAZLOO
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.06.2026 Heard Ms. D.D. Roy, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party-respondent nos. 1 & 2.
2. The applicants as the writ petitioners have preferred the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2825/2026 seeking inter alia a direction to the opposite parties-respondent nos. 1 & 2 to make payment of the death claim in compliance of the Judgment and Order dated 29.06.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kamrup at Guwahati in MAC Case no. 2554/2009.
3. The instant application has been filed by the applicants-writ petitioners seeking impleadment of the following authority :- ‘The Collector, Kamrup [Metro], Office of the District Commissioner, Kamrup [Metro], Bakijai Branch, Lichubagar, Guwahati’
- as party-respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition.
4. It is averred that for adjudication of the issues raised in the accompanying writ petition, the proposed party-respondent is a necessary party.
5. I have gone through the statements and averments made in the application as well as the issues raised by the applicants-writ petitioners in the accompanying writ petition.
6. As the proposed party-respondent appears to be a necessary party for adjudication of the issues raised in the accompanying writ petition, the instant application is allowed.
7. The learned counsel for the applicants-writ petitioners is to file amended cause-title in terms of the Notification no. 79 dated 19.06.2023 before the Registry for impleadment of the afore-stated authority as party-respondent no. 4 within 2 [two] working days from today.
8. In the event of filing of an amended Cause-Title, Registry to carry out necessary corrections in the Cause-Title of the writ petition as well as in the CIS. After the necessary corrections, the accompanying writ petition is to be listed in the motion column accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant