Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3339/2025 of BINITA DAS BARUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 21 June 2026
GAHC010262742025 2026:GAU-AS:9203 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: WP(C)/3339/2025 BINITA DAS BARUAH W/O- SRI DEBAJIT BARUAH R/O- H/NO. 7 BALIRAM RAJBONGSHI PATH P.O. AND P.S. GORCHUK DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010262742025
2026:GAU-AS:9203
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No.: WP(C)/3339/2025
BINITA DAS BARUAH
W/O- SRI DEBAJIT BARUAH
R/O- H/NO. 7
BALIRAM RAJBONGSHI PATH
P.O. AND P.S. GORCHUK
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
ASSAM
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI-01
ASSAM
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
For the Applicant(s) : None appears
Page No.# 2/2
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. G. Hazarika, SC, Revenue
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
22.06.2026 None appears on behalf of the Petitioner on call. Ms. G. Hazarika, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent No.1. None has also appeared on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. This Court has duly taken note of the order passed by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court on 20.06.2025 whereby the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court had categorically held that the notice of eviction was issued after giving a hearing to the Petitioner, and as such, the learned Coordinate Bench was not inclined to pass any interim order. It is therefore seen that when the matter has been listed today, the Petitioner is not interested in the instant proceedings.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant