Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4605/2025 of ILAI MIYA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 21 June 2026
GAHC010176572025 2026:GAU-AS:9197 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4605/2025 ILAI MIYA S/O- FAKAR UDDIN AHMED, R/O- VILL.- RONGPUR, P.O. BROJENDRAPUR, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN- 788152. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS TO
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010176572025
2026:GAU-AS:9197
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4605/2025
ILAI MIYA
S/O- FAKAR UDDIN AHMED, R/O- VILL.- RONGPUR, P.O. BROJENDRAPUR, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN- 788152.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANJABARI, JURIPAR, GUWAHATI-781037.
2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
BELTOLA-BASISTHA ROAD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SRIBHUMI
P.O. AND DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN- 788710.
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRIBHUMI
ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND DIST. SRIBHUMI
PIN- 788710.
5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
NILAMBAZAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
P.O. KALIGANJ BAZAR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
PIN- 788720.
Page No.# 2/2
6:THE SECRETARY
SINGUA GAON PANCHAYAT
P.O. BROJENDRAPUR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
PIN- 788156.
7:SIRAJ UDDIN
S/O- MAKRAM ALI
R/O- VILL.- RONGPUR
P.O. BROJENDRAPUR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
PIN- 788156
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. R. Talukdar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.06.2026
Mr. A. R. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that he has received instructions from his client not to press the instant writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Interim order passed if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant