Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2049/2026 of SRI HARESWAR GOGOI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 June 2026
GAHC010120462026 2026:GAU-AS:9001 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2049/2026 SRI HARESWAR GOGOI SO LATE BHOIRABESWAR GOGOI, RO GAMES VILLAGE CAMPUS BLOCK A9, 103, LALMATI, BASISTHA, GHY, DIST KAMRUP M VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010120462026
2026:GAU-AS:9001
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2049/2026
SRI HARESWAR GOGOI
SO LATE BHOIRABESWAR GOGOI, RO GAMES VILLAGE CAMPUS BLOCK
A9, 103, LALMATI, BASISTHA, GHY, DIST KAMRUP M
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GHY 06,DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-7.
3:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN )
ASSAM ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-07
KAMRUP METRO
4:THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (A)
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007.
5:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
GUWAHATI POLICE COMMISSIONERATE
KAMRUP METRO
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
(ADMIN)
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP METRO
7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
GORCHUK POLICE STATION
GARCHUK
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP METR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MS. S KAKATI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.06.2026 Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the applicant, has submitted that in the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025, this Court had recorded as follows : “13. Accordingly, since it is admitted position that there is no criminal case pending before any of competent court of law and he has been exonerated in the departmental proceeding, the respondents shall take immediate steps to have the case of the petitioner considered by a Selection Committee, if necessary, and if not already considered, for promotion and give effect to the recommendation of the selection Committee for promoting the petitioner from the post of ASI (UB) to the post of ASI (UB). It is made clear that if the petitioner is afforded the promotions, the date of effect shall be such that he maintains seniority over his immediate junior in the Feeder cadre.”
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was required to be considered for the promotion to the post of SI(UB) and not ASI(UB). Mr. A. Chakravarty, learned counsel for all the respondents, has submitted that it would amount to correction of typographical error and he has no objection to the same. Accordingly, paragraph 13 of the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025 shall be read as follows : “13. Accordingly, since it is admitted position that there is no criminal case pending before any of competent court of law and he has been exonerated in the departmental proceeding, the respondents shall take immediate steps to have the case of the petitioner considered by a Selection Committee, if necessary, and if not already considered, for promotion and give effect to the recommendation of the selection Committee for promoting the petitioner from the post of ASI (UB) to the post of SI (UB). It is made clear that if the petitioner is afforded the promotions, the date of effect shall be such that he maintains seniority over his immediate junior in the Feeder cadre.” This order will be read as a part of the order dated 25.05.2026, passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025. I.A. is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant