Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5203/2020 of MOFIAL HOQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 21 June 2026
GAHC010174212020 2026:GAU-AS:9206 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5203/2020 MOFIAL HOQUE S/O LATE TARU SK VILLAGE BHIMAPARA, PO FULERCHAR, PS AND DIST SOUTH SALMARA, MANKACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010174212020
2026:GAU-AS:9206
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5203/2020
MOFIAL HOQUE
S/O LATE TARU SK
VILLAGE BHIMAPARA, PO FULERCHAR, PS AND DIST SOUTH SALMARA, MANKACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM LAND AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR.. GUWAHATI 6
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR HATSINGIMARI
3:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER
DHUBRI AND KOKRAJHAR
PO
PS AND DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM 783301
4:ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER
MANKACHAR REVENUE CIRCLE
PO AND PS MANKACHAR
DIST SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSA
For the Petitioner(s) : None appears
Page No.# 2/2
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Goswami, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
22.06.2026
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner on call.
2. It is the case of the Petitioner herein that the Respondents should be directed to grant allotment of land to the Petitioner.
3. This Court duly takes note of the affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2 wherein it is seen that the Petitioner was granted allotment of land admeasuring 2 kathas 10 lechas covered by Dag No.99/268. It therefore appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in the instant writ petition for which the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant