Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1488/2026 of THE PRESIDENT Vs NAGARJHAR NAU JUWAN CLUB AND LIBRARY AND 12 ORS on 21 June 2026
GAHC010018182026 2026:GAU-AS:9204 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1488/2026 THE PRESIDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, HILAPAKARI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, SHAHJAHAN ALI AHMED, AGE 65 YEARS, S/O LATE
GAHC010018182026
2026:GAU-AS:9204
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1488/2026
THE PRESIDENT
SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, HILAPAKARI
HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, SHAHJAHAN ALI AHMED, AGE 65 YEARS, S/O LATE MAFIJ UDDIN, R/O JAYUR, HOWLY, BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN
781316
VERSUS
NAGARJHAR NAU JUWAN CLUB AND LIBRARY AND 12 ORS
A REGISTERED SOCIETY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHARFUL
ALOM, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE SOHRAB ALI, R/O VILL.
NAGARJHAR, P.O. AND P.S. HOWLY, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781316
2:ANISUR RAHMAN
S/O. LT. MAHMUDUR RAHMAN
R/O. VILL.- NAGAJHAR
P/O. AND P/S. HOWLY
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
3:HAFIZUR RAHMAN
S/O. LT. ALI AJGAR
R/O. VILL.- JAIPUR
P/O. AND P/S. HOWLY
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781316
4:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY OF THE ASSAM GOVT.
SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Page No.# 2/7
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
ASSAM
PIN-781006
5:THE SECRETARY OF THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE DEPARTMENT
JANATA BHAWANM DISPUR
ASSAM
PIN-781006
6:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-781019
7:THE DIRECTOR
SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE
RUDRA SINGH SPORTS COMPLEX
SUPER MARKET
DISPUR
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-781006
8:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BUILDING
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-03.
9:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BARPETA
ASSAM
P/O. AND P/S. BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781301
10:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION)
P/O. AND P/S. BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781301
11:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
BARPETA
ASSAM
P/O. AND P/S. BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781301
12:THE DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICER
GANDHINAGAR
BARPETA
P/O. AND P/S. BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781301
13:THE PRINCIPAL
HILAPAKARI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
JAIPUR
HOWLY
BARPETA
P/O. AND P/S. BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-78131
Linked Case : WP(C)/1057/2025
NAGARJHAR NAU-JUWAN CLUB AND LIBRARY AND 2 ORS.
A REGISTERED SOCIETY REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY
SHARFUL ALOM
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
SON OF LATE SOHRAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAGARJHAR
P
O. AND P.S.-
HOWLY
DISTRICT - BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-
781316
2: ANISUR RAHMAN
SON OF LATE MAHMUDUR RAHAMN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAGARJHAR VILLAGE
P.O. AND P.S.- HOWLY
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM.
3: HAFIZUR RAHMAN
SON OF LATE ALI AJGAR
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JAIPUR
P.O. AND P.S.-
HOWLY
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-781316
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
SECONDARY EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 781006
2:THE SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE DEPARTMENT
JANATA
BHAWAN
DISPUR
ASSAM. PIN- 781006
3:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI- 781019
4:THE DIRECTOR
SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE
RUDRA SINGH SPORTS COMPLEX
SUPER MARKET
DISPUR
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-781006
5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-
781003
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-
781003
7:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION)
P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA
DIST.-
BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-781301
8:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
BARPETA
ASSAM
P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM.
PIN-781301
9:THE DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICER
GANDHINAGAR
BARPETA
P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA
DIST.-
BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-781301
10:THE PRINCIPAL
HILAPAKARI HIGHER SECONDARY
SCHOOL
JAIPUR
HOWLY
BARPETA
P.O. AND P.S.-
BARPETA
DIST
- BARPETA
ASSAM. PIN-781316
11:THE PRESIDENT
SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
HILAPAKARI HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL
JAYPUR
HOWLY
BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-781316
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. Y. S. Mannan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. J. Dutta, Advocate BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
22.06.2026 Heard Mr. Y. S. Mannan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants who are the Respondent Nos.10 & 11 in the accompanying writ petition.
2. The Applicants herein have sought for vacation of the order dated 16.12.2025 whereby the interim order passed earlier in WP(C) No.1057/2025 was extended till the next date.
3. It is the submission of Mr. Y. S. Mannan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants that when the writ petition being WP(C) No.1057/2025 was disposed of, the interim order merged with the final order dated 11.04.2025 passed in WP(C)
No.1057/2025. Thereupon, when the order dated 11.04.2025 was reviewed vide the order dated 24.11.2025 in Review Petition No.222/2025, the interim order which was passed in WP(C) No.1057/2025 no longer was in existence, and therefore, the interim order could not have been extended vide the order dated 16.12.2025 passed in WP(C) No.1057/2025.
4. It is the opinion of this Court that the said contention is misconceived in as much as vide the order dated 24.11.2025 passed in the Review Petition No.222/2025, when the order dated 11.04.2025 passed in the writ petition was recalled, the interim order passed earlier could not have merged with the order dated 11.04.2025. The interim order which was passed in the writ petition, i.e. the order dated 28.02.2025 revived upon, the writ petition being restored to the file. Under such circumstances, the order so passed by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 16.12.2025 thereby extending the order dated 28.02.2025 cannot be said to be an error.
5. Accordingly, this Court does not find any merit in the instant application for which the application stands rejected.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant