Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/4209/2025 of INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR Vs BIJOY SONOWAL AND 2 ORS. on 21 June 2026
GAHC010230292018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/4209/2025 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR REPRESENTED BY CMD INDIAN OIL BHAVAN NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 1 SRI AUROBINDO MARG YUSUF SARAI NEW DELHI PIN -
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010230292018
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/4209/2025
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY CMD
INDIAN OIL BHAVAN
NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE
1
SRI AUROBINDO MARG
YUSUF SARAI
NEW DELHI
PIN - 110016
2: THE MANAGER (LPG S) AND FVC MEMBER
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
TINSUKIA.
VERSUS
BIJOY SONOWAL AND 2 ORS.
S/O DURGADHAR SONOWAL
R/O NAGAMATI KHEREMIA GAON
NAMRUP
P.O.- PARBATPUR
P.S.- NAMRUP
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM.
2:CIRCLE OFFICER
NAHARKATIA REVENUE CIRCLE
NAHARKATIA
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM.
3:CHAIRMAN
NAMRUP TOWN COMMITTEE
NAMRUP
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM.
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. N. Goswami, Govt. Advocate Mr. M. Sarmah, SC, IOCL
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Borthakur, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
22.06.2026
This is an application filed by the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 to the accompanying writ petition seeking vacation of the order dated 09.10.2018.
2. It is the opinion of this Court that taking into account that the interim order has been continuing from 09.10.2018 till date, the accompanying writ petition be heard on merits. It is also noticed that in the accompanying writ petition, the pleadings are complete.
3. Considering the above, the instant application stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant