Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1997/2026 of SMT PANJALI DEURI ALIAS SMT PADUMI DEURI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 June 2026
GAHC010099032026 2026:GAU-AS:9199 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1997/2026 SMT PANJALI DEURI ALIAS SMT PADUMI DEURI W/O-LT BORGORAM DEURI,VILL-PATORKUCHI,NO 2 MAIDAMGAON,P.O.- BASISTHA,KAMRUP METRO,GUWAHATI,ASSAM 2:
GAHC010099032026
2026:GAU-AS:9199
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1997/2026
SMT PANJALI DEURI ALIAS SMT PADUMI DEURI
W/O-LT BORGORAM DEURI,VILL-PATORKUCHI,NO 2 MAIDAMGAON,P.O.- BASISTHA,KAMRUP METRO,GUWAHATI,ASSAM
2: SRI SARBANARAYAN KRISHNA DEURI
S/O-LT BORGORAM DEURI
VILL-PATORKUCHI
NO 2 MAIDAMGAON
P.O.-BASISTHA
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
3: SRI PUNENDRA KUMAR DEURI
S/O-LT BORGORAM DEURI
VILL-PATORKUCHI
NO 2 MAIDAMGAON
P.O.-BASISTHA
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THROUGH THE SECRETARY,DEPT OF REVENUE,DISPUR,GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
GUWHATI
ASSAM
3:THE ADDL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
REVENUE AND LAND SETTLEMENT
KAMRUP METRO
GUWHATI
ASSAM
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
DISPUR
KAMRUP METRO
GUWHATI
ASSAM
5:BRIHATTAR PATORKUCHI UNNAYAN SAMITEE
THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY
VILL-PATORKUCHI
NO.2 MAIDAMGAON
P.O-BASISTHA
KAMRUP METRO
GUWHATI
6:SRI GOPAL RAJBONGSHI
S.O-LT. THANESWAR RAJBONGSHI
VILL-PATORKUCHI
NO.2 MAIDAMGAON
P.O-BASISTHA
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHAT
Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. SA Bakhtiar Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. PR Mahanta for respondent No.1
Mr. HK Hazarika, Junior Govt. Advocate
Mr. S Deka for respondent No.6.
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.06.2026
Heard Mr. SA Bakhtiar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
2. This is an application filed by the applicant seeking leave of this Court to change the address of the respondent No.5, which was incorrectly mentioned in the cause-title of the accompanying writ petition being WP(C)No.880/2017.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the correct address of the respondent No.5 is reflected at paragraph No.5 of the instant application.
4. It is the opinion of this Court that the above prayer so made in the instant application can be allowed.
5. Accordingly, this Court permits the applicant to change the address of the respondent No.5 by incorporating the correct address mentioned at paragraph No. 5 of the instant application.
6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/writ petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7(seven) days from today and the Registry on the basis of the fresh memo of parties along with the instant order shall make the necessary corrections in the cause-title of the accompanying writ petition and update the same in the CIS.
7. Interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant