Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2107/2026 of NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs SMTI. POBI BORAH @ POBI PADI BORAH AND ANR on 21 June 2026
GAHC010122542026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2107/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE- ARUP PRAKASH MANSION BHANGAGARH G.S ROAD GUWAHATI DISTRICT-
GAHC010122542026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2107/2026
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
REGIONAL OFFICE- ARUP PRAKASH MANSION
BHANGAGARH
G.S ROAD
GUWAHATI
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781005.
VERSUS
SMTI. POBI BORAH @ POBI PADI BORAH AND ANR
W/O LATE PAPU BORAH
RESIDENT OF AJAR CHAPARI
P.O- PANIGAON
DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-787055
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O BILKUL BORAH
BYE LANE NO. 2
HOUSE NO.5
BORBARI
P.O. AND P.S. - DISPUR
DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM PIN-781036.
2:SRINATH BUILDING H. CO. PVT. LTD.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
S/D/W OF MA 2C/2D
VERDHANMAN APARTMENT
JANAKI PATH
NEAR JAIN MANDIR
GANESHGURI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781006
------------
Advocate for : MRS. P B BORDOLOI
Advocate for : appearing for SMTI. POBI BORAH @ POBI PADI BORAH AND
ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.06.2026 Heard Mrs. P. B. Bordoloi, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant.
2. By way of this application filed under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, the applicant/appellant has prayed for stay of the operation and execution of the judgment and order dated 22.04.2026 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees’
Compensation,
Kamrup-cum-Assistant
Labour Commissioner, Kamrup in W.C. Case No. 35/2018.
3. Having considered the submissions advanced and taking note of the fact that the accompanying appeal has been preferred under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be served by granting interim protection, subject however to compliance with the statutory requirement prescribed under the proviso to Section 30(1) of the Act.
4. Accordingly, the operation and execution of the impugned judgment and order dated 22.04.2026 shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal, subject to the appellant depositing the amount payable under the impugned award in terms of the proviso to Section 30(1) of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, if not already deposited, within a period of 6 (six) weeks from today and producing the certificate of such deposit before the Registry.
5. In the event of failure to comply with the aforesaid condition within the stipulated period, this order shall stand vacated automatically without any further reference to the Court.
6. The interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant