Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3211/2026 of NAVO PRAVAT AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 18 June 2026
GAHC010117782026 2026:GAU-AS:8900 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3211/2026 NAVO PRAVAT AND ORS NGO, ASSAM, ( A YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NEW GUWAHATI RLY. COLONY IN FRONT OF QR. NO.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010117782026
2026:GAU-AS:8900
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3211/2026
NAVO PRAVAT AND ORS
NGO, ASSAM, (A YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL WELFARE
SOCIETY) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NEW GUWAHATI RLY. COLONY IN
FRONT OF QR. NO. 55-515, NEAR NEW GUWAHATI ADARSHA HIGH
SCHOOL, BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWHATI-21,REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT SRI PRAVEEN BAISHYA.
2: SRI PRAVEEN BAISHYA
NAVO PRAVAT
NGO
ASSAM
BHASKAR NAGAR
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI-21
DIST.- KAMRUP (M)
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
GUWAHATI
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
P.W.D. (ROAD)
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-3
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Page No.# 2/2
TRAFFIC PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1
ASSAM
5:THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
HOARDING AND ADVERTISEMENT BRANCH
BETKUCHI GUWAHATI
ASSAM PIN-781035.
6:THE COLLECTOR
GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
HOARDING AND ADVERTISEMENT BRANCH
BETKUCHI GUWAHATI-ASSAM
PIN-78103
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ZAMAN, MR BASAB DEY,MR P C DEY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, GMC,SC, P W D
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.06.2026
Mr. P.C. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as due to inadvertence, some errors have been crept in in the writ petition, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, GMC has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the above submission of Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant