Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/121/2026 of SHRI SANJEET KUMAR BORAH Vs THE ASSAM UNIVERSITY AND 9 ORS. on 18 June 2026
GAHC010001282026 2026:GAU-AS:8839 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/121/2026 SHRI SANJEET KUMAR BORAH SON OF SHRI LOHIT CHANDRA BORAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAHARBARI BANGALI, P.MAZ ROWMARI, P.S.- DHEKIAJULI, DISTRICT -
GAHC010001282026
2026:GAU-AS:8839
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/121/2026
SHRI SANJEET KUMAR BORAH
SON OF SHRI LOHIT CHANDRA BORAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAHARBARI BANGALI, P.MAZ ROWMARI, P.S.- DHEKIAJULI, DISTRICT - SONITPUR, PIN- 784117, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE ASSAM UNIVERSITY AND 9 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, SILCHAR- 788011, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM.
2:THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN I.E. THE VICE CHANCELLOR
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
3:THE BOARD OF RESEARCH STUDIES
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON I.E. THE VICE CHANCELLOR
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
4:THE VICE CHANCELLOR
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
5:THE REGISTRAR
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
6:THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR (RES)
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
7:THE DEAN
TRIGUNA SEN SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
8:THE HEAD (IN CHARGE)
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
TRIGUNA SEN SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM
9:DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH COMMITTEE (DRC)
REPRESENTED BY THE HEAD IN-CHARGE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
TRIGUNA SEN SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM
10:RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE (RAC)
REPRESENTED BY THE HEAD IN-CHARGE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
TRIGUNA SEN SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
ASSAM UNIVERSITY
SILCHAR- 788011
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M NATH, MAUSAM NATH,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,MR.
D J KAPIL
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AG,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19.06.2026
Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Ms. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, Assam University, is present.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as having become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant