Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026 of JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR Vs SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR on 18 June 2026
GAHC010111112026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026 JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR SON OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA, RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO. 401, RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT, LAKHIMI PATH, HATIGAON, DISPUR,
GAHC010111112026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026
JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR
SON OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA, RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO.
401, RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT, LAKHIMI PATH, HATIGAON, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781038, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM., REPRESENTED
HEREIN BY THE ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O SHIBA PRASAD CHAKRABORTY, R/O HOUSE
NO. 76, K.K. PATH, 3RD BYE LANE, CHENIKUTHI HILL SIDE, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781003
2: INDU DEVI
WIFE OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA
RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO. 401
RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT
LAKHIMI PATH
HATIGAON
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781038
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM.
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY SUBIMAL
CHAKRABORTY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
S/O SHIBA PRASAD CHAKRABORTY
R/O HOUSE NO. 76
K.K. PATH
3RD BYE LANE
CHENIKUTHI HILL SIDE
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN- 78100
VERSUS
SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR
DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (M), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT
COMMISSIONER, LICHUBAGAN, HENGERABARI, KAMRUP (METRO), GUWAHATI-781036, ASSAM.
2:MRINAL BORAH
A.C.S.
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER)
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
LICHUBAGAN
HENGERABARI
KAMRUP (METRO)
GUWAHATI-781036
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MOMI KALITA,MR N M DEKA,MR M M
ZAMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19-06-2026 Mr. Iranglube, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Chamaria, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the relief sought for by the petitioners, has been granted to the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners do not want to proceed further with the contempt petition. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Iranglube, learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant