Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/2721/2026 of SAIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010100152026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2721/2026 SAIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR S/O LATE EUSUB ALI LASKAR, VILL GANGANAGAR PART-I. P.O. GANGANAGAR. P.S. KACHUDARAM, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010100152026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2721/2026

SAIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR

S/O LATE EUSUB ALI LASKAR, VILL GANGANAGAR PART-I. P.O.

GANGANAGAR. P.S. KACHUDARAM, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF

ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF ASSAM (A AND E)

MAIDAMGAON

BELTOLA

GUWAHATI-28.

4:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES

ASSAM

5:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, S. M. ZINNA,MS S R MAZARBHUIYA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, GA, ASSAM,SC, FINANCE DEPTT.,SC, AG (A

AND E)

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 18.06.2026

Mr. A.M.Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for consideration of his grievance, as regards subscription of NPS, as the petitioner’s service has been provincialised in the year 2021 and having realised that the petitioner has not approached the concerned authority. Mr. S. Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department , Mr. B. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Ms. K. Phukan, learned State Counsel and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department are present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead