Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1819/2026 of INDRAJIT BORO Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 17 June 2026
GAHC010051572026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1819/2026 INDRAJIT BORO SON OF LATE RAJANI BORO, R/O- GORCHUK, P.O. AND P.S.- GORCHUK, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781035 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010051572026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1819/2026
INDRAJIT BORO
SON OF LATE RAJANI BORO, R/O- GORCHUK, P.O. AND P.S.- GORCHUK, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781035
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
P.S.- DISPUR
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781036
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI- 781029
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
4:MRS. ANAMIKA SARMA
D/O- LATE SHUSHIL KR. SARMA
W/O- SRI MUKUT SARMA
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.13
BIRUBARI PROFESSORS COLONY
PANCHAJAINYA PATH
GUWAHATI-16
Page No.# 2/2
DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
PIN- 78101
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P A AHMED, MR M HOQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, MR. J DEKA(R4),MR. P S
BHATTACHARYYA(R4),GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.06.2026
Mr. P.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3; and Mr. J. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 are present. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition with liberty. The learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer made the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant