Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2038/2026 of MD FARUK AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010121942026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2038/2026 MD FARUK AHMED S/O- LATE MAFIJUDDIN AHMED, R/O-SHOTKHIL VILLAGE, PO- MORANJANA, PS- RANGIA, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM- 781354 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM

GAHC010121942026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2038/2026

MD FARUK AHMED

S/O- LATE MAFIJUDDIN AHMED, R/O-SHOTKHIL VILLAGE, PO- MORANJANA, PS- RANGIA, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM- 781354

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

HOME A AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI781006.

3:THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

HOME A AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI781006

Advocate for the Petitioner : IMSENKALA, MR S DUTTA,MS. J CHETRY,MS M BORAH,MS.

B CHOWDHURY,MR A CHOWDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,

For the Applicant(s)/Appellant(s) : Ms. B. Chowdhury, Sr.counsel Ms. J. Chetry, counsel For the Respondent(s)/Opposite party(s) : Mr. S. Baruah, GA, Assam Mr. A. Roy, counsel appearing through VC

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

18-06-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)

1. We have heard Ms. B. Chowdhury, learned Sr. counsel, assisted by Ms. J. Chetry, learned counsel, for the applicant/appellant and Mr. S. Baruah, learned Government Advocate, Assam and Mr. A. Roy, learned counsel, for the respondents/opposite parties.

2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of the delay of 44 days in preferring the connected Writ Appeal against the common Judgment and Order dated 01.04.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 535/2025 and other writ petitions.

3. Perused the averments made in the application.

4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 44 days in preferring the connected appeal.

5. We, therefore, condone the delay.

6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

7. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 16.09.2026 under the appropriate heading.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead