Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3190/2026 of SRI SANKARACHARYYA BARUAH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010120642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3190/2026 SRI SANKARACHARYYA BARUAH SON OF LATE NETRA MOHAN BARUAH,RESIDENT OF P.N.G.B. ROAD, MULIABARI, DIGBOI,P.O./P.S.- DIGBOI, PIN-786171,DISTRICT-TINSUKIA,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010120642026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3190/2026

SRI SANKARACHARYYA BARUAH

SON OF LATE NETRA MOHAN BARUAH,RESIDENT OF P.N.G.B. ROAD, MULIABARI, DIGBOI,P.O./P.S.- DIGBOI, PIN-786171,DISTRICT-TINSUKIA, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, NEW DELHI.

2:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE

REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-9

ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG

BANDRA EAST

MUMBAI400051.

3:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ASSAM OIL DIVISION

DIGBOI

REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER

DIGBOI

DISTRICTTINSUKIA

ASSAM.

4:THE ESTATE OFFICER AND DGM ADMIN WELFARE

UNDER THE PUBLIC PREMISES

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION OF INDIA ASSAM OIL DIVISION

DIGBOI.

Page No.# 2/2

5:MR PABITRA KUMAR DEWRI

ESTATE OFFICER

UNDER PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS

ACT

1971-CUM-DGM ADMIN WELFARE

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ASSAM OIL DIVISION

DIGBOI.

6:THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY US 9 OF THE PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION

OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS

DISTRICT JUDGE

TINSUKIA

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H. BURAGOHAIN, MR. C AGARWAL,MS. H BORAH,MS A

DEVI,M BURAGOHAIN,MR Z MUKIT,MR. A SATTAR

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. W RAHMAN,MR. LENTSO,MR. K KALITA,MR. A

SARMA,FOR CAVEATOR,SC, I O C

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

18.06.2026

Mr. H. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition in order to avail appropriate remedy. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead